Bills vetoed for other reasons that also stripped protections from workers
| Bill | Labor Protection Removed | Lombardo's Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 AB 74 | Applied prevailing-wage protections to construction performed through certain NSHE affiliation agreements, even when the work was not otherwise considered a public work. | He said it unnecessarily expanded prevailing wage to smaller NSHE projects and public-private partnerships, increasing costs and delays. |
| 2023 AB 281 | Required ventilation improvements in certain senior-living facilities and required corrective HVAC work to be performed by a skilled and trained workforce substantially composed of apprenticeship graduates. | He said the work could already be funded administratively, newer standards might produce expensive upgrades, the grant process was unclear and the implementing agency's fiscal note was unfunded. |
| 2025 AB 226 | Required businesses receiving specified state tax abatements or transferable tax credits to submit a community-benefits agreement — securing local hiring, job-quality and workforce commitments. | He said "community benefits" was undefined, requirements could vary between jurisdictions and enforcement would be arbitrary, burdensome and harmful to Nevada's business climate. |
| 2025 SB 447 | Allowed an eligible party to seek a writ of mandamus and attorney's fees when a public body improperly avoided Chapter 338 public-works contracting requirements — including prevailing-wage obligations — by mislabeling construction as maintenance. | He said existing legal remedies were adequate and that expanding mandamus would encourage litigation, delay public projects and interfere with fact-specific procurement decisions. |
Thirty vetoes. Two sessions. One clear message from Joe Lombardo: corporations first, workers last. It's time to send a message back.
See Our 2026 Endorsements Organize Your Workplace